Research Program / Claims / point-of-power-2

You, at the present point of intersection of psyche and flesh, according to your beliefs, choose one event from among probabilities and concretize it.

你由目前灵与肉的交接点,按照你的信念由可能性中选择一件事而将之具体化。

Concept point of power · Domain Belief Dynamics and Mind–Body Regulation · mechanism · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status untested · ★ fundable

This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.

Seth sources (book §session)
Adjudicating experiment
First, restrict 'concretization' to altering external random outcomes without behavioral contact: about 500 people across two independent laboratories, each completing 200 pre-fixed random target trials, randomly assigned to strong-expectancy versus neutral instructions; equipment isolated, automatic timestamps, blinded analysis, with no-participant runs matched. Duration about 6–12 months. Use participants and sessions as clustering units, pre-register effect thresholds, stopping rules, and independent replication; even if positive, it would only demonstrate anomalous statistical dependence and could not alone localize the so-called intersection point.
Suggested paper title
Expectancy and Isolated Random Outcomes: A Preregistered Multilaboratory Study
What it would overturn
If, after excluding information leakage, behaviorally mediated effects, and equipment errors, the effect still holds, it would revise the hypothesis that 'human beliefs cannot alter the output distribution of an isolated random system in the absence of physical causal pathways.'
Candidate labs / funders
Fabrizio Benedetti;预期与安慰剂机制研究; Helané Wahbeh;Institute of Noetic Sciences,研究意识与异常信息体验([研究项目](https://noetic.org/research/noetic-signature-characteristics/))
Specificity of Seth's formulation
No definition is given for the intersection point, the sample space of probabilities, selection probabilities, or effect size, so the original text does not constitute a quantitative mechanism; only by committing to external effects independent of behavior does it differ from ordinary decision-making and self-fulfilling prophecy.
Note
Placebo, attentional bias, and actions changing life outcomes all have conventional research foundations, but none of them can serve as direct evidence for 'creating external events from probabilities.'
Evidence (1, DOI-verified via Crossref)
  • Understanding the mechanisms of placebo and nocebo effects — Elisa Frisaldi; Aziz Shaibani; Fabrizio Benedetti (2020), Swiss Medical Weekly
    综述信念和治疗情境影响症状的机制,但没有检验“灵肉交接点从可能性中使外部事件具体化”。[论文](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32920787/)

Cite: Future Mind Institute, Seth Material Research Agenda, claim point-of-power-2, https://www.seth.org.cn/en/research/claims/point-of-power-2