Research Program / Claims / point-of-power-12
Psychic voice is a more suitable method for Seth communication than automatic writing; Jane could use this method to receive Seth messages.
心理声音是比自动书写更适合赛斯沟通的方式，珍可用此法接收赛斯讯息。
Concept point of power · Domain Belief Dynamics and Mind–Body Regulation · ontological claim · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status untested · ★ fundable
This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.
Seth sources (book §session)
Adjudicating experiment
Specifically refers to Jane's comparison that cannot be re-run as a randomized experiment; one may first verify whether comparable contemporaneous audio recordings, manuscripts, durations, and externally checkable issues exist, and conduct a pre-registered archival analysis, lasting about 6–12 months, while acknowledging material selection bias. A generalization experiment could recruit about 80 adults using both inner speech and automatic writing simultaneously, plus 80 matched controls, randomly assigned in a crossover design to both output conditions, 8–12 sessions per person over about one year; blind ratings of fluency, consistency, accuracy, and confidence, and use hidden randomized targets to test information gain. The two output modalities need to be matched for time and motor load, with subjective suitability and source authenticity as separate endpoints.
Suggested paper title
Inner Speech and Automatic Writing: A Preregistered Crossover Study of Fluency, Source Attribution, and Information Accuracy
What it would overturn
Merely demonstrating that inner speech is more suitable for a given person does not overturn mainstream assumptions; only demonstrating that it provides reliable information not obtainable through ordinary channels would revise the hypothesis that 'the content of inner speech depends on individual cognition and already acquired information.'
Candidate labs / funders
Helané Wahbeh；Institute of Noetic Sciences（[研究方向](https://noetic.org/explore/science-of-channeling/)）; Alexander Moreira-Almeida；Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora，Research Center in Spirituality and Health; Andrew Newberg；Thomas Jefferson University，意识状态与神经影像研究
Specificity of Seth's formulation
The original text refers to a specific person and output modality, but 'more suitable' may only mean comfort, speed, or expressive quality; without a criterion for accuracy, there is no distinctive prediction that could identify the source of information.
Note
Reduced activity in certain brain regions during automatic writing does not mean the brain is uninvolved; experiential authenticity, normal functioning, fluent output, and information originating from an independent entity are four distinct issues.
Evidence (2, DOI-verified via Crossref)
Cite: Future Mind Institute, Seth Material Research Agenda, claim point-of-power-12, https://www.seth.org.cn/en/research/claims/point-of-power-12