Intuitive understanding and intellectual discrimination can help one rise above one's own era, abandoning shortsighted belief frameworks.

直觉理解与智性辨别可助人跃升于自身时代之上，抛弃短视的信仰框架。

Concept intuition · Domain Intuitive–Rational Cognitive Integration · ontological claim · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status untested · ★ fundable

This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.

Seth sources (book §session)

mass-events §830

Adjudicating experiment

Approximately 600 participants are randomly assigned to four groups: intuitive clue training, analytical reasoning training, combined training, or an active control, training for 8 weeks with 12 months of follow-up; predictions are made on science and public events whose outcomes are not yet known, along with counterevidence-updating tasks scored objectively. Primary endpoints are Brier scores relative to contemporaneous group benchmarks and false-belief correction rates; the interaction effect of combined training is tested, controlling for knowledge, political stance, and numeracy. This experiment can adjudicate adaptive judgment advantages but cannot adjudicate the value-laden "transcending one's era."