Research Program / Claims / emotions-1

Emotions are generated by beliefs, but the triggering of natural disasters operates directly at the emotional level; the overall emotional tone connects to the environment through the body and is transformed into external physical conditions.

情绪由信念生成,但自然灾难的触发直接落在情绪层面;整体情绪基调通过身体与环境连接转化为外部物理条件。

Concept emotions · Domain Belief Dynamics and Mind–Body Regulation · mechanism · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status contradicted

This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.

Seth sources (book §session)
Adjudicating experiment
Restrict the claim to the incremental prediction of local severe convection by collective emotion: daily emotion sampling from approximately 20–30 regions and about 10,000 residents, prospectively tracked over 3–5 storm seasons, combined with weather station, radar, lightning, and numerical forecast data. Pre-register a 24-hour prediction window and maximum wind gust as the primary outcome, reserve test sets by region and year, and control for emotion changes induced by weather forecasts, season, population activity, and pollution. Several hundred relatively independent storm events are required; even if prediction improves, causal direction must be further tested with randomized emotion interventions.
Suggested paper title
Collective Affect and Local Storm Intensity: A Preregistered Prospective Test of Incremental Predictive Validity
What it would overturn
If direct causal action is demonstrated after excluding behavioral and environmental mediation, it would revise the hypothesis that local storm evolution is explained by measurable atmospheric initial conditions, boundary conditions, and physical forcing.
Candidate labs / funders
Kerry A. Emanuel(气旋动力学;相邻研究,不代表支持该主张); Kevin N. Ochsner(认知重评与情绪调节); National Center for Atmospheric Research(大气模拟与观测)
Specificity of Seth's formulation
Emotion directly triggering disasters poses a stronger causal claim than cognitive reappraisal theory, but it specifies neither emotion type, radius of action, time lag, dose, nor disaster type, so it currently lacks distinguishable quantitative predictions.
Note
General note: status refers to the core strong assertion of the original sentence; evidence includes supporting sub-propositions and literature limiting their extrapolation; untested means that no direct test was found in this search, without guaranteeing no one globally has studied it; sample sizes below are planning magnitudes and must be power-calculated according to the minimum effect of interest and clustering structure; paper_title are proposed titles; who does not imply endorsement of Seth; the contradicted in this item refers to the interpretation of emotion as a direct driver of disasters.
Evidence (2, DOI-verified via Crossref)

Cite: Future Mind Institute, Seth Material Research Agenda, claim emotions-1, https://www.seth.org.cn/en/research/claims/emotions-1