Research Program / Claims / a-1-8
Science equates rational thinking with the entire reference framework; other thinking perspectives are regarded as irrational; thought is over-specialized and inflexible, and science is split into disciplines that do not integrate with each other.
科学将理性思考等同于整个参考框架,其他思考角度被视为非理性;思想过度专门化、缺乏弹性,科学分裂为互不整合的学科。
Concept A-1 state · Domain Consciousness States and Attentional Dynamics · methodological suggestion · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status contested · ★ fundable
This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.
- magical-approach
- Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success — Lindell Bromham; Russell Dinnage; Xia Hua (2016), Nature部分支持制度障碍:澳大利亚资助数据中,跨学科程度与资助成功率负相关;不能据此证明科学全面排斥非分析思维。[论文](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315)
- Interdisciplinary researchers attain better long-term funding performance — Ye Sun; Giacomo Livan; Athen Ma; Vito Latora (2021), Communications Physics限制概括:英国逾44000项资助记录显示跨学科研究者有较好的长期资助表现,与“学科互不整合”的绝对说法不符。[论文](https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00769-z)
Cite: Future Mind Institute, Seth Material Research Agenda, claim a-1-8, https://www.seth.org.cn/en/research/claims/a-1-8